Showing posts with label Rene Descartes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rene Descartes. Show all posts

Monday, October 17, 2022

Books by and on René Descartes - Recommended Reading List

René Descartes is one of the most influential thinkers in history and the father of modern philosophy. Here is a reading list and recommendations to some of the most important books by Descartes and on him. To learn more about Descartes' philosophy before diving in to his books check out our introduction to Descartes.


Best books by René Descartes

Meditations on First Philosophy is not only the first book by Descartes to start with, it is most probably the first book in modern philosophy to read. Meditations is a 6 chapter quest into one could ever possibly hope to know about the world and himself.  

Discourse on Method precedes Meditations and could serve as a basis for understanding Descartes' project. Discourse on Method, as the names suggests, deals with the method of gaining true knowledge, the philosophical basis for modern science.  

Not so well known but very interesting is Descartes’ The Passion of the Soul which deals with the body/mind problem and includes other later writings. 

Some other good options to start reading Descartes are his Selected Philosophical Writings or the (kindle) essential collection.

 

Books on Descartes

Tom Sorell offers A Very Brief Introduction to Descartes which will give you an overall look on Descartes, his thinking and influence. This is a good option if you're do not have a lot of philosophical background.  Another introductory option is How to Read Descartes.

Understanding Rene Descartes will walk you through a reading of Meditation on First Philosophy. 

A more advanced and academic choice is the The Cambridge Companion to Descartes which goes in-depth into many topics in his thought.  

A very academic and advanced option is the Essays on Descartes series. 

For a personal perspective try Descartes' Biography by Desmond Clarke.


 

 


Monday, March 21, 2022

Methodical Doubt: Descartes' Doubt Explained with Examples

Methodical Doubt (or Cartesian Doubt) is a philosophical method developed by the philosopher René Descartes. The question that preoccupied Descartes in his books Meditations and Discourse On Method was how to obtain secure knowledge and how to know whether what one has learned is correct. Methodical Doubt initially consists of doubting everything, or in other words that everything should be doubted. The purpose of Descartes' doubt is to arrive at something which cannot be doubted and which is therefore certain knowledge. The certain knowledge that Descartes initially arrives at is that he exists because he thinks: cogito, ergo sum ("I think, therefore I am").  Even when he doubts everything else, he can not doubt his own existence.


Rules of Methodical Doubt

Descartes was thorough in his search for a sure insight. He set out four methodological rules for systematically doubting:

1.To begin with, one must consider it only as true, which appears clearly and distinctly to the consciousness and to the senses. For example, it is clear that a triangle has only three sides and that a sphere has only one surface.

2. Each problem must be divided into as many sub-problems as possible. A sub-problem is easier to solve than the whole problem. For example, if you want to find out how a house is built, it does not help much if you stand outside and look at the whole house. You get a better understanding if you go into the house and examine each floor separately.

3. One should start with the elements which are the simplest. Then one has to gradually move on to the more complicated elements. For example, one should not start by examining whether the double of 32 is 64. One should start by examining whether the double of 1 is 2. Once one has found out that this is the case, one can join, that the double of 2 is 4 and so on...

4. One should make a count of all the conditions that are relevant to the problem one is investigating. Otherwise, our knowledge will not be secure and complete. On the other hand, you should only count the conditions that are relevant to the solution of the problem and do not include anything superfluous in your count. For example, if you want to examine whether the area of ​​a circle is larger than all other figures with the same circumference, then you do not need to examine all conceivable figures. One only needs to examine a limited number of figures. Then one can agree whether this rule applies to all other figures that have the same circumference as the circle.

Monday, February 21, 2022

Descartes' Dream Argument Explained

The dream argument (In René Descartes' Meditation and in Philosophy in General) is the assertion that the act of dreaming provides intuitive evidence such that it is indistinguishable from that which our senses provide to us in the waking state, and that, for this reason, we cannot fully trust the senses we use to distinguish reality from illusion . Consequently, any experience coming from our senses should at least be carefully examined and rigorously tested to determine if it really refers to "reality".

Descartes uses the argument of the dream in his Meditations on First Philosophy (Meditation 1) to show the uncertain nature of the information given by the senses. The argument thus takes place in a series of thought experiments: optical illusions, then madness and evil genius. Descartes emphasizes the realistic nature of the dream, and the difficulty of distinguishing it from sensation in the waking state: "How many times have I dreamed, at night, that I was in this place, that I was dressed, that I was near the fire, although I was quite naked in my bed? But this argument, if it is relevant to questioning sensible knowledge, which is why Descartes is looking for others, to end up with the evil genius. Descartes ends up giving himself the refutation of this argument of the dream: "our memory can never bind and join our dreams to each other and with all the continuation of our life, as it is wont to join things that happen to us while awake". It is the continuity that will make it possible to distinguish the dream from the day before.



Tuesday, October 12, 2021

Descartes' Wax Argument Explained

Descartes' wax argumrent appears in the second chapter of his Meditations. Descartes watches the wax as it changes shape and melts when heated. According to Descartes we know wax by the properties perceived by the senses ('tangible properties'). However, the tactile properties are not essential to waxing. The spread is the essential feature of the wax. The spread of the wax is known through the mind itself, without the help of the senses. If so, the final conclusion is: The wax is known through the mind and not through the senses. 

Descartes proposes the perception of place in space, the 'spread', as a feature that cannot be stripped of wax. The meaning of the experiment is not only for the wax, but for the material in general. (The experiment is similar to what we did to the self - the attempt to undo all the attributes, except those that cannot be undone).Expansion is not a tangible property (it can be discussed in the amulets of mathematics and geometry, in the mind only). This implies the claim that the senses are misleading, because they are not material to matter (this is different from the same claim in the first logic , where the argument was that the senses sometimes mislead me).


See also: Descartes' Dream Argument Explained


Monday, October 4, 2021

Descartes' moral philosophy - Cartesian ethics - summary

Cartesian moral philosophy is found in particular in Descartes' Discourse on Method, where the provisional moral maxims are made, It finds its metaphysical basis in the dualism of thinking and bodily substances , a dualism which does not exclude a de facto composition of these in man, which manifests itself in particular in the passions. The other important aspect, linked to the theory of knowledge , concerns the role of error and the definition of freedom , contrasted with two forms offreedom of indifference . 
Descartes renews the Platonic thesis according to which "no one does evil willfully": indeed, if it can be a good for the will to go against what the understanding presents to it, it is only so. The evil therefore is both proof of the freedom of the human will, but it's also a simple negation, that is to say proof of imperfection, towards God; but from the human point of view this negation is also a deprivation, that is to say an imperfection, not so much of its nature, but only of its acts 


If methodical doubt is beneficial for what concerns theoretical knowledge, the extension of this doubt to practice would paralyze us. But we must act, even in the face of uncertainty. Descartes thus proposes in the Discourse of the method a "morality by provision", while waiting to find better. He thus sets out the following three provisional maxims:

first maxim: custom, observe the religion and customs of one's country and follow what the wisest people actually think;
second maxim: resolution, to carry out the decision with firmness once it has been taken;
third maxim: self-control, seeking rather to overcome oneself rather than fortune.
He will then develop his ideas on morality mainly in his correspondence with Princess Elisabeth and with Queen Christine. He endeavors to formulate therein a method for attaining the supreme good , ie the inner pleasures of the soul , which alone are eternal and founded on truth . For this, it sets out the following means:

To have a clear knowledge of what is good , ie in the first place, to know God , which makes us feel an intellectual love for him;maintain his will firmly and resolutely. If we waste our time wondering about all the elements of our daily life , we will never get anywhere. So we often have to resolve issues without having complete knowledge of them. But, once the decision is made, we must hold fast to our judgment , as long as events do not prove our error to us.
master your passions , and leave what is not in our power, ie knowing how to distinguish between what is not in our power and what is in our power. Only the will is in our power, strictly speaking. This virtue is the cardinal virtue of Cartesianism, it is generosity.

Descartes / Principles of Philosophy - good summary

Principles of Philosophy is a book written by René Descartes . In essence, it is a synthesis of the Discourse on Method and Meditations. . The book was primarily intended to replace the Aristotelian modelthen used in French and British universities. The work provides a systematic statement of his metaphysics and natural philosophy , and represents the first general explanation of the mechanistic Universe  .

Descartes tried to present, in the form of a textbook, a whole system of thought about the nature of matter, the nature of the mind, and the participation of God in the creation and starting of the Universe.

The book consists of four parts:

The first chapter of Principles of Philosophy deals with metaphysics and issues such as cognition , the sources of human knowledge and understanding, and the relationship between a perfect and omniscient God and human error, both intellectual and moral.
For Descartes Philosophy is the study of wisdom, understood as the ability to conduct human activities; and also as the perfect knowledge of all things that a man can know for the direction of his life, the maintenance of his health, and the knowledge of the arts. Only God is perfectly wise, and man is more or less wise, in proportion to the knowledge he has of the most important truths.
The degrees of knowledge. Descartes identifies four degrees of knowledge, which he names as common knowledge, and a fifth that he designates as the highest. The first degree consists of clear and obvious ideas that can be acquired without even a need for meditation. The second degree is all that knowledge that is learned through the senses. The third is what we learn when we talk to other people. The fourth consists of what we can learn from the writings of people capable of giving good instructions.
The highest knowing. There have been great men throughout time who have sought a better and truer wisdom, a fifth degree of knowledge. This has consisted in the search for the first causes, and those who have followed this search have been called philosophers, but Descartes believes that no one has yet been successful in this task.
Doubt and certainty. Since Plato and Aristotle , there has been a discussion about doubt and certainty . Those who have favored doubt have gone to the extreme of doubting even the most obvious things, and those who have sought certainty have relied excessively on the senses. Although it has been accepted that the senses can deceive us, according to Descartes, no one has yet expressed that the truth cannot be based on the senses, but on the understanding , when it is founded on obvious perceptions.
Meditations on the first philosophy. The search for the first causes or basic truths, as understood by Descartes, is in this work. Explain the metaphysical principles on which the rest of the knowledge can be built.
The tree of philosophy. Philosophy is like a tree, whose roots are metaphysics , its trunk is physics and the branches are the rest of the sciences, mainly medicine , mechanics and morals , which is the last level of sanity . In the same way that the tree has its fruits in its outer parts, the utility of philosophy is also contained in the parts that are learned at the end.
Second part 

Part 2 of Principles of Philosophy deals with the general principles of physics and the theory of the laws of motion.

It proposes the principles of nature - the Laws of Physics - seen by Descartes. Above all, it puts forward the principle that, in the absence of external forces, the motion of an object will be uniform and in a straight line. Isaac Newton borrowed this principle from Descartes and included it in his own Principia ; to date it is still called Newton's first law . 2

The third part of Principles of Philosophy is dedicated to astronomical phenomena. His theory of vortexes postulated that space was occupied by an invisible fluid (the ether ) that rotated forming celestial vortices , and the Sun was the center of one of them. This would drag planets, which will be the center of other smaller vortices that would act on satellites like the Moon .

Descartes attacked Copernicus's theories , arguing that bodies that are already in motion remain in motion in a straight line, unless they are deflected. The Cartesian Cosmos was a perfect mechanism created by God that works in a deterministic way without any intervention. Or, as Voltaire put it , it was like a clock that continues to tick eternity since its inception.

This idea was very powerful because it explained how the celestial bodies moved without forces acting at a distance , something inconceivable for the time. The vortex theory was advocated in France for almost a hundred years, even after Isaac Newton . 3 4

The fourth part deals with the properties of minerals, metals, magnets and other natural phenomena and their apprehension through the senses. 

Descartes proposed that the magnetic attraction was caused by the circulation of small helical particles , "threaded parts", which circulated through parallel threaded pores in the magnets , through the South pole, the North pole and then through space around the magnet. Back to the south pole. Opposite twisted particles circulated in the opposite direction. When the "threaded parts" approached a lodestone or piece of iron, they passed through its pores, causing a magnetic force.

Saturday, October 2, 2021

Meaning of "Cogito ergo sum": short simple explanation

Cogito, ergo sum is a Latin phrase meaning“I think, therefore I am”. Used by French philosopher René Descartes in the Discourse on Method (1637), the formula has a variant in his work in 1641, in  Meditations : ego sum, ego existo ("I am, I exist" ). For Descartes it expresses the first certainty which resists a methodical doubt.. Seeking to completely rebuild knowledge, Descartes wishes to find a solid foundation, absolutely certain. This research leads him to the conclusion that only his own existence, as a "thing that thinks", is initially certain. It is this discovery that the "cogito" expresses. Regardless of the formulations, the cogito constitutes a major element of Cartesian thought. There is a certainty from which Descartes will attempt to rebuild all knowledge. It consists of an intuition that is not limited to a logical deduction.


Descartes' method of doubt explained simply

In the philosophy of René Descartes, the method of doubt (or Cartesian doubt, Descartes' Doubt or methodical doubt) is a way of seeking certainty by systematically doubting everything. Descartes decided on this method of doubt after confronting the many and endless discussions held by the traditional scholastics , which seemed to yield no results. Descartes saw the cause in the fact that no undoubted certainties had yet been found in philosophy on which to build. Descartes proposed to move on to a methodical doubt , ie to doubt everything that could possibly be doubted, even the scientific insights of the time and the Holy Scriptures. If you leave out everything that can be doubted, you are left with only that which is necessarily true, according to Descartes.

In summary, the method of doubt is a central element in René Descartes' philosophy and is divided into segments, summarized by the statement: 'initially nothing is certain'. According to Descartes, there is always doubt about the authenticity of sensory perceptions, for which he uses the example of optical illusions in his work Méditation métaphysique . In addition, there is also a hyperbolic doubt : the doubt, which previously related to what was observed, in Descartes reaches all aspects of reality, including abstract concepts and mathematical truths. This thought process eventually led Descartes to an absolute knowledge, the cogito. Among other things, it enabled him to demonstrate, empirically rather than logically, the existence of human freedom.

see also:  Meditations on First Philosophy - summary

Tuesday, November 14, 2017

Short Summary: Rene Descartes - History of Philosophy

Rene Descartes (1596-1650) was both a philosopher and a mathematician; a rationalist who only believed in reason. Descartes wanted to build a philosophical system from the ground up, rather than relying on the work of others. “The father of modern philosophy” Interested in “certain” knowledge and the relationship between the body and the mind. Descartes was not a total skeptic. There must be a connection between the body and consciousness, but they are not exactly the same. (Sort of like Plato’s belief in separation between body & soul.) Believed in a philosophical system that goes from simple to complex. Descartes realized that you can’t trust your senses. But, he realized that he did doubt his own senses. In order for him to be able to do that, he must exist. Thus, we have “I think, therefore I am.” What else could he perceive? a perfect entity, God. Descartes felt that the idea of God was innate and therefore also exists. The more self-evident something is to one’s reason, the more certain he was that it must exist. After that quantitative properties (weight, etc.) were deemed okay, but qualitative ones were not. However, there is an outer reality because a perfect God would not deceive us. God’s guarantee – what we perceive with reason corresponds to reality. Descartes thought of two realities: thought & matter. These two have no contact with each other. Thus, Descartes was a dualist. Animals belong completely to extended reality, but man is a dual creature. Bodily processes obey laws of matter. But, the mind is independent of extended reality. According to Descartes the mind can be affected by the physical, but it can also detach itself.

To know more about the philosophy of Rene Descartes you can go to our overview and summary of Descartes' philosophy. If you want to get to know specific works by Descartes you can go to our summaries of his Discourse on the method or Meditations on the First Philosophy (or the extended summary by chapter of Meditations on the First Philosophy). 

Suggested reading on Renè Descartes:


 


Good to books to start exploring the history of philosophy:


  

Sunday, July 16, 2017

Descartes / part 6 of Discourse on the Method - summary

In part 6 of "Discourse on the Method" René Descartes writes that although not feeling a personal need for publishing his work, he feels he must do so in order to further human knowledge in practical fields such as engineering and medicine. Understanding God as the source of natural law and tracing the manner in which this law works can promote great benefit for men. But Descartes also warrants a highly careful attitude towards natural studies. Not causing too much social alarm and controversy and having a very firm basis for one's arguments can prove to be very beneficial for science.
Descartes welcomes criticism of his work by others, but he does note that he cannot see any holes in his theory not already considered by him. Descartes also welcomes people continuing his work from where he left off, though he doubts what else can someone else think of that he himself has failed to write.   
-

Suggested reading on Renè Descartes:


    

Descartes / part 5 of Discourse on the Method - summary

In part 5 of "Discourse on the Method" (titled: " Physics, the heart, and the soul of man and animals ") René Descartes moves from the metaphysics of part 4 to physical considerations. Descartes was hesitant in previously publishing his thoughts on the matter following Galileo's contamination over his heliocentric views, but now he feels more confidant in their acceptance.
Descartes first discusses light and its natural origins, considering celestial bodies as conveying light and humans as the perceivers of that light. He then discusses matter, saying that God's laws must be perfect and therefore imperative in any possible world (not just ours). These laws separate, according to Descartes, matter into bodies which operate in consistency with these laws. What's important to note here is not so much Descartes' physics but rather the notion to natural law, originating in God, can account for all natural phenomena. If we, let's say, take God out of the equation nothing will change. One way to see this is to argue that Descartes holds up the "God as watchmaker" view, meaning that God has created the laws which govern the world without his interference. Another possible interpretation is much more radical and could at the time come at a very high cost for Descartes who tip toes around the notion of a purely rational, none-religious, account of natural order. Descartes avoids heresy by claiming that while nature can be understood through natural law the capacity of the human soul for reason must be Godly. Reason is what for Descartes separates us from animals. Reason and its subsequent use of language is what makes humans, unlike animals, act on more than just instinct. This, for Descartes, proves that our souls come from God and are in fact immortal.      
-

Suggested reading on Renè Descartes:


 

Descartes / part 4 of Discourse on the Method - short summary

In part 4 of his "Discourse on the Method" (titled: "Proof of God and the Soul") René Descartes implements his own method of inquiry described in part 2 and part 3. The important part of this chapter is Descartes' methodological doubt, a maxim according to which anything that can be doubted will be regarded as methodologically false. This will insure to truthfulness of everything that survives this severe scrutiny.

Very much like in his later "Meditations on the First Philosophy", Descartes decides to abandon any sensory information on the charge that those have been known to deceive us. He also abandons everything that might come from experience, holding that we can never know if we are dreaming or not (see 
Descartes' Dream Argument). This pretty much leaves everything we know our but Descartes notes that there is one thing that cannot be doubted and that is that there is someone or something thing which is doubting. Doubt is a thought, and even if that thought is entirely wrong there is still someone performing it. This leads Descartes to his famous conclusion of "I think therefore I am". This assertion will serve as the basis for all knowledge of the world that can now be build upon its certainty. Note that Descartes' existence is only a mental one, at this point of his philosophy the body and anything material for that matter is under doubt and therefore excluded (this is very similar to what Descartes does in meditation 2 and meditation 3 in "Meditations").

After proving that he himself exists, Descartes moves on to ask what else can he be sure of. While doubting objects in reality is very possible, Descartes holds that doubting God in not possible. The reason is that God is perfect, and as such cannot be doubted. Since Descartes is imperfect, it is not possible for him to conceive of something perfect like God on his own (only vice-verse, to perfect can conceive the imperfect). This means not only that God must exist but also that everything he has created must also exist (Descartes later developed his proofs of God in Meditations). After thus establishing his metaphysics in the form of proving the Self and God, Descartes can move on to the physics which is the topic of part 5 and part 6 of "Discourse on the Method".   

More about Descartes:

     -

Suggested reading on Renè Descartes:

 

Descartes / part 3 of Discourse on the Method - short summary

In chapter 3 of his "Discourse on the Method" (titled: "Morals and Maxims accepted while conducting the Method") René Descartes is getting to ready to dive into the rabbit hole of methodological doubt. Before he does that he makes sure to inscribe for himself a few methodological precautions to complete the rules described in part 2 of the book.

The first rule of chapter 3 is to remain obedient to the law of his country and religion. It's not that Descartes believes that these laws are necessarily true, but his thinks that should he lose everything he knows, these will at least serve as good guidelines to fall back on. Descartes also resolves to follow the actions of those in his country that seam most sensible, for much the same reasons.

The second rule Descartes devises for himself is decisiveness of action. Taking a wrong path is better than no path at all, and making a wrong decision is better that no decision since that latter would keep us in our place. In a sense what Descartes is saying is that over thinking can be stagnating.

The third rule Descartes proposes in chapter 3 of "Discourse of Method" might sound a bit New-Age, arguing that his intent is not the change the world (on which he has no influence) but rather to change himself and the manner in which he perceives his world (something which in entirely up to him). This is not only modesty on Descartes' part but also a will for autonomy and a desire not to be conditioned by external factors. The one thing we have control over in this world is our thoughts, and we should make sure that it stays that way.

These maxims are not suggested by Descartes as a moral code, but rather as a way of optimizing his method in search of certainty. Part 4 of "Discourse on the Method" will find to such certainties: God and the Soul.
-

Suggested reading on Renè Descartes:


 

Descartes / Discourse on the Method - part 2 - summary

In chapter 2 of his "Discourse on the Method" (titled: "The principal rules of the Method which the Author has discovered") René Descartes starts to build his scientific method of thought. After describing in part 1 of Discourse on the Method how his travels has led him to doubt, Descartes now describes how he found himself in a well-heated room withdrawn from the world. This led Descartes to ponder the achievements of the individual compared with that of collectives, reasoning that the former are better than the latter (God, for example, is an individual who created great things). The purest form of thought, Descartes argues, in the one conducted alone.

In order to implement this line of thought Descartes decides to abandon everything he has learned from other people in order to remain with what only his own reason can tell him.

In order to insure the validity of his reasoning, Descartes devices a method build on four principles that will serve as guidelines for his inquiry:
1. not to accept anything as true unless it is clearly evident.
2. To simplify the inquiry by dividing any problem into the smallest possible parts.
3. To start with the simplest questions and move on to the more difficult ones.
4. To be circumspect and self-critical by constantly reviewing and reevaluating the conclusions.

This is not only the basis for Descartes' later considerations in "Discourse on the Method" and "Meditations on the First Philosophy", but can also be considered as the first basic maxims of modern scientific thought and practice. In chapter 3 of the book Descartes will add a few more rules and moral codes that will direct and give form to his philosophical inquiry.          

-

Suggested reading on Renè Descartes: