Showing posts with label semiotics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label semiotics. Show all posts

Monday, August 14, 2023

Summary: The Third Meaning by Roland Barthes

In "The Third Meaning," Roland Barthes explores the concept of an obtuse meaning in film, which is a signifier without a signified. This third meaning is not located in language or language use, but rather in the image itself. It is a subversive element that disrupts the practice of meaning-making and is outside of articulated language, yet within interlocution. The filmic, which is the founding act of the filmic itself, lies precisely in that region where articulated language is no longer more than approximative and where another language begins.

Barthes argues that the still, a photograph taken from a film, offers us the inside of the fragment and throws off the constraint of filmic time. It is a quotation that is parodic and disseminatory, and it is the fragment of a second text whose existence never exceeds the fragment. While film is bound by the constraint of logical time, the still allows for a reading that is instantaneous and vertical, teaching us how to dissociate the technical constraint from what is the specific filmic and which is the "indescribable" meaning.

Barthes's exploration of the third meaning and the filmic provides a theoretical framework for understanding the ways in which film operates beyond language and meaning-making. It suggests that the power of film lies not only in its narrative or aesthetic qualities but also in its ability to evoke an ineffable, indescribable meaning that cannot be captured by language alone.


Read more:

Friday, July 14, 2023

"The Photographic Message" by Barthes - summary and overview

Overview

In "The Photographic Message," Roland Barthes analyzes the message of a press photograph, which he sees as composed of three parts: the source of emission, the channel of transmission, and the point of reception. While the emission and reception of the message fall within the field of sociology, the photograph itself requires a specific method of analysis focused on its unique structure.

Barthes argues that the photograph is a continuous message without a code, as it is an analogue of reality. However, he suggests that the photographic message is not purely denoted but also connoted through various procedures, such as trick effects, pose, objects, photogenia, aestheticism, and syntax. These procedures add a second-order message derived from a code that is communicated to the public.

Barthes highlights the paradox of the photographic message, which is both objective and invested, natural and cultural. He suggests that the connoted message in a photograph is produced by a modification of the reality itself, of the denoted message. The photograph allows the photographer to conceal the preparation to which he subjects the scene to be recorded.

Barthes emphasizes the importance of understanding the mode of imbrication of denoted and connoted messages to reply to the ethical paradox of being neutral and objective while creating a connoted message. He concludes that the photographic message is a double structure-denoted-connoted, and the connoted message develops on the basis of a message without a code.


Summary of "The Photographic Message"

This "The Photographic Message" provides a detailed analysis of the various connotation procedures of photographic images, shedding light on the intricate relationship between the image and its cultural context. Barthes explores different aspects of photographic connotation, including gesture, pose, objects, photogenia, aestheticism, and syntax, and shows how each of these elements contributes to the overall meaning of a photograph.

One of the key points made in "The Photographic Message" is that the code of connotation is historical and depends on the reader's cultural situation. The author argues that the meaning of a photograph is not fixed or objective but is rather shaped by the cultural codes and assumptions of the society in which it is produced and consumed. This means that the same photograph can be read in different ways by different people, depending on their cultural background and knowledge.

Another important aspect of photographic connotation that the author explores is the role of text in accompanying a photograph. Barthes argues that the text accompanying a photograph is a parasitic message designed to connote the image, and the image no longer illustrates the words. In other words, the text is secondary to the image and is used to supplement or enhance the meaning of the photograph.

"The Photographic Message" also discusses the paradoxical nature of the photograph, which transforms an inert object into a language and the unculture of a "mechanical" art into the most social of institutions. The author suggests that this paradox arises from the fact that the photograph is both an objective record of reality and a highly subjective medium of cultural expression. The photograph captures a moment in time and space, but its meaning is always shaped by the cultural codes and assumptions that surround it.

In summary, "The Photographic Message" provides a fascinating exploration of the complex and multifaceted nature of photographic connotation. It shows how the meaning of a photograph is shaped by a range of cultural, historical, and linguistic factors, and how the photograph itself is a paradoxical medium that both captures and transforms reality. Whether you are a photographer, a visual artist, or simply someone interested in the power of images to shape our understanding of the world, this document is sure to provide valuable insights and perspectives.


Know more:

Roland Barthes Explained





Tuesday, March 21, 2023

Roland Barthes's semiotics explained

Roland Barthes's semiotics is a philosophical approach to studying communication and its elements of meaning. It was first developed by Barthes in the 1960s and has since been adopted by many scholars in their study of human signification.

In its simplest form, semiotics is the study of signs and symbols. These signs and symbols can be anything from words and images to gestures, facial expressions, body language and anything we use to convey information and meaning. Semiotics looks at how these signs and symbols are used to create meaning and how meanings are interpreted by the receiver. The founder of modern semiotics is ofter considered to be Ferdinand de Saussure, and he is the origin of Barthes's discourse about the sign, signifier and signified.

Barthes's approach to semiotics was to focus on the meaning of the relationship between the signifier and the signified. He argued that the signifier (the sign) is a physical representation of the signified (the concept). This relationship is essential in the understanding of any kind of communication, as the signifier is the physical representation of the signified, which is the concept that is being communicated.

Barthes also argued that the signifier is not simply a physical representation of the signified, but that it is also an active element in communication. He believed that the signifier has the power to create meaning and that it is up to the receiver to interpret the message. This means that the receiver can interpret the message in different ways depending on the context, the culture, and their own background and experience.

Read more about Barthes:



Monday, February 6, 2017

Short summary: Death of the Author - Roland Barthes

'"The Death of the Author" (1967) is a famous essay by Roland Barthes and a meditation on the rules of author and reader in the formation of meaning as mediated by the text. Roland Barthes's essential argument is that the author has no sovereignty over his own words (or images, sounds, etc.). The finale meaning of any written text belongs to the reader who interprets it. When we encounter a literary text, says Barthes, we need not ask ourselves what the author intended in his words but what the words themselves actually say. Text employ symbols which are deciphered by readers, and since function of the text is to be read, the author and process of writing is irrelevant.


The literary text after the death of the author

The “death of the author" means that meaning is not something retrieved or discovered, having been there all the while, but rather something spontaneously generated in the process of reading a text, which is an active rather than passive action. In other words the action of reading overrides that of the original writing, in turns in itself into a sort of writing.

Barthes does not intend to suggest that the death of the author lets any reader read any text any way he or she like (though others like the Yale School perused this line of thought). What Barthes is suggesting is that reading always involves at least a little bit of writing or rewriting of the text's meaning.

Barthes' essay is an attack on traditional literary criticism that focused too much on trying to retrace the author's intentions and original meaning in mind. Instead Barthes asks us to adopt a more text oriented approach that focuses on the interaction of the reader, not the writer, with it. This means that the text is much more open to interpretation, much more fluid in its meaning than previously thought.  



      

For additional summaries of works by Roland Barthes:


Go in depth: 

  

Sunday, April 8, 2012

Roland Barthes – Myth Today – Summary, Review and Analysis – part 3

In "Myth Today" (in Mythologies) Roland Barthes follows de Saussure's observation regarding the arbitrariness of the lingual sign. But in myth, Barthes argues, the sign entirely arbitrary and it is possible, at least partially, to give a reason why one signifier has a certain meaning attached to it (unlike ordinary, none-myth, language). This does not mean that the relation between signifier and signified in myth is obligatory, for the same meanings can be signified in different ways. But still the relation is not arbitrary because it uses symbols, metaphors and metonyms to convey a certain identifiable meaning.

Myth, according to Barthes and unlike certain formulation of the concept of ideology in the Marxist tradition, does not conceal anything, but it does distort. The myth according to Barthes is an ideological apparatus which portrays reality in a certain manner and in compliance with a certain ruling ideology (Althusser presents a similar argument in Ideologyand Ideological State Apparatuses). The myth does not deny the presence of anything, but it does deny its historicity and it being open to other readings (this is Barthes' initial inclination from structuralism towards post-structuralism). The myth flattens and limits the scope of meaning of the sign It uses and makes sure it could be understood in only one manner.

This is according to Barthes the power of the myth. The none-arbitrary nature of relation between the signifier and the signified presents this link as factual and as a lucid representation of reality as it really is. A myth in that sense is not what it says, but the underlining "natural" and self evident assumption on which it is founded. What presents itself as natural robs signs of their historicity and political nature and thus denies and conceals power struggles and relations in society. This is similar to Marx's description of ideology as "cameraobscura" which inverts reality. Like Claude Levi-Strauss, myth for Barthes is a type of collective illusion, a story that society tells itself in order to justify its own world the way that it is. 

Roland Barthes - Myth Today - Summary, Analysis and review - part 1 - part 2 - part 3 -criticism

Be a pro reader, get the book:

  

see also:Roland Barthes - The Death of the Author