Gramsci borrowed military terminology to describe different revolutionary strategies. A "war of maneuver" involves direct frontal assault—concentrated offensive aimed at seizing state power quickly, exemplified by the Bolshevik Revolution. A "war of position" resembles trench warfare—prolonged struggle to win social positions, build organizations, and establish cultural hegemony before attempting power seizure. These metaphors helped Gramsci explain why revolutionary tactics succeeding in Russia failed in Western Europe.
Social Conditions Determining Strategy
The choice between strategies depends on specific historical conditions, particularly civil society's development. In early 20th-century Russia, weak civil society meant the state stood relatively exposed; revolutionaries could seize power through rapid assault. In Western democracies, robust civil society created complex defensive networks protecting state power. Here, frontal assault would fail; revolutionaries needed to win positions within civil society, building alternative institutions and counter-hegemonic culture.
The War of Position in Practice
War of position requires patient organizational work: developing working-class intellectuals, creating independent media and education, building unions and cooperatives, contesting cultural common sense. Rather than waiting for revolutionary crisis, movements actively construct alternative hegemony. This strategy recognizes that consciousness doesn't spontaneously emerge from economic conditions but requires sustained cultural and political work. Success demands both building popular support and maintaining revolutionary objectives against pressures toward accommodation.
See also:
Contemporary Applications
These concepts remain relevant for understanding social movements today. In consolidated democracies with extensive civil society, movements face similar strategic questions. Should activism focus on electoral politics, institutional reform, or building alternative institutions? How can movements maintain radical vision while achieving concrete gains? Gramsci's framework suggests that lasting transformation requires sustained engagement across multiple sites—workplaces, communities, culture, and politics—rather than singular dramatic confrontations.
