We think politics is about laws, borders, budgets. It is also about clocks. Who gets deadlines and who gets extensions? Whose emergencies count as urgent, and whose are told to wait their turn? Chronopolitics names this quiet arena of struggle: the ways institutions, markets, and media organize time to distribute power.
From factory whistles to push notifications, timekeeping has always been governance by other means. E. P. Thompson showed how industrial capitalism disciplined workers into punch-clock precision; Barbara Adam traced how modernity abstracts time from seasons into standardized units that fit accounting sheets. More recently, Elizabeth Freeman calls the normative tempos of work, romance, and family “chrononormativity,” while Johannes Fabian exposed anthropology’s “denial of coevalness,” placing colonized peoples in another, “earlier” time. Sarah Sharma maps how infrastructures—airports, apps, rideshares—allocate speed and slowness unevenly; Mark Rifkin and Achille Mbembe show how settler and colonial regimes control futures by seizing calendars, not just land.
Introducing Chronopolitics
Three axioms help frame the field of multiple times and temporalities:
-
Time is allocated. Waiting rooms, backlogs, fast lanes, priority queues—these are policies, not natural conditions. To make someone wait is to assert authority over their horizon.
-
Time is embodied. Bodies keep circadian, menstrual, aging, and disability rhythms. When institutional clocks ignore them, fatigue and harm follow. Pace has a physiology.
-
Time is mediated. Platforms and prediction systems reorder pasts and futures: feeds privilege the “now,” while risk scores drag possible futures into the present as credit limits, police patrols, or insurance premiums.
Case in Point: Where Chronopolitics Lives
-
Gig Work: Apps slice hours into micro-tasks, optimize routes, and penalize “idleness.” Workers live in hyper-scheduled time while benefits arrive—if at all—on glacial administrative calendars.
-
Migration: Asylum seekers inhabit administrative limbo—years of interviews, hearings, and appeals—proof that sovereignty often exercises itself as delay.
-
Carceral Time: Sentences, parole, and probation produce thick calendars of check-ins and curfews; freedom is paced, not granted.
-
Debt: “Buy now, pay later” smooths consumption by exporting cost to the future, tethering lives to repayment clocks that govern choices years ahead.
-
Climate: Politicians invoke “emergency” to accelerate projects; communities ask for seasonal sovereignty to burn, fish, or rest with ecologies rather than news cycles.
-
Platforms: “On this day” resurfaces pasts without consent; trending tabs compress public attention into spikes, punishing long-form deliberation.
In each scene, time is not background—it’s the instrument.
Counter-Chronologies
Resistance also has a tempo. Labor movements fight for the right to disconnect and predictable shifts. Indigenous governance keeps calendars aligned with fish runs and fire regimes rather than investor quarters. Queer and feminist politics experiment with off-beat life courses that refuse chrononormative scripts of graduation-marriage-mortgage. Abolitionist organizing insists on long attention—casework, court support, records—against the spectacle of crisis.
Handles for Change: Designing Temporal Justice
If timing is political, it can be redesigned.
-
Temporal Impact Assessments: Before approving projects or algorithms, audit who will wait, who will rush, and for how long.
-
Service Rhythms that Fit Bodies: Clinic and transit hours tuned to shift work, caregiving peaks, religious observance, and school days.
-
Explainable Prediction: When systems pace futures via scores, require transparency, appeal, and expiration—due process for time.
-
Guaranteed Time Floors: Paid sick leave, sabbaticals, and minimum scheduling notice create buffers where life can synchronize with health.
-
Public Temporalities: Civic rituals and slow media (citizen assemblies, deliberation windows, archiving practices) that privilege duration over virality.
Chronopolitics and Us
Clocks quietly decide distributive questions we usually debate in money or rights. They set whose life gets compressed into hustle and whose stretches across affordable waiting; whose grief is granted a ritual interval and whose must return to work tomorrow. In the era of algorithmic governance and climate volatility, learning to read and re-write institutional tempos may be as important as any budget line.
Chronopolitics asks a simple question with unruly consequences: What would justice look like as a schedule? The answer won’t be one speed for all. It will be negotiated tempos—some accelerated, some decelerated, some protected from either—that let bodies, ecologies, and communities keep time together without breaking.
See also: The Present Is Crowded: Living Among Multiple Temporalities
