You can't log off your liver. You can't swipe away your spleen. And yet, every few months, someone tries to sell you on the fantasy of "going offline" as if it's a kind of spiritual cleanse, a return to some Edenic pre-digital state. Let me be clear: there is no offline. There hasn't been for a while. Your phone is not just an external tool; it has become an internal organ—an extension not just of your body, but of your cognition, your memory, your very sense of self. Welcome to technogenesis.
Technogenesis, a term popularized by N. Katherine Hayles, describes the co-evolution of humans and technology. It's not just that we shape tools; the tools shape us back. Glasses changed how we read, the clock changed how we perceive time, and the smartphone—well, it has changed everything. Attention, intimacy, navigation, even the way we mourn. Ever scroll through an old friend's Instagram, years after they've passed? That's not just nostalgia. That's techno-cultural necromancy.
But let’s not get spooky yet. The more immediate point is that the divide between "online" and "offline" is a comforting lie. There is no pristine, unmediated self waiting to be recovered if you just uninstall Instagram or take a yoga retreat. What you experience as "yourself" is already inextricably bound up with digital platforms, cloud servers, haptic feedback, and algorithmic nudges. In this sense, the self is no longer merely embodied; it is technologically distributed. You are partly made of circuits.
This isn’t meant to be dystopian or paranoid. It’s just the anthropology of now. Think of it like this: you don’t remember phone numbers anymore, not because you’re lazy but because your brain has adapted to outsource that function to the device. Cognitive offloading is the norm, not the glitch. And if you've ever Googled a symptom instead of calling your doctor, congratulations—you've used the technosphere as an epistemological prosthetic.
The philosopher Bernard Stiegler warned that when memory is externalized (in writing, in devices, in databases), it always comes at a cost. Something is gained—speed, efficiency, scalability—but something is lost too: slowness, depth, forgetfulness-as-a-feature. But unlike Stiegler’s melancholic tone, I don’t think the point is to judge this transformation. The point is to notice it.
Because once you see your phone as an organ, you start asking different questions. Not: "How do I detox from tech?" but "What kind of hybrid creature am I becoming?" Not: "Is this real connection?" but "How has connection itself been reshaped by mediation?" The goal isn't to escape the technosphere. It's to become literate in it. To treat the interface not as a veil, but as part of your skin.
So, no, you're not logging off. But maybe you can learn to log on with more intention, more criticality, more weird grace. Your spleen doesn't have an update cycle. Your phone does. But they're both keeping you alive in their own way. Act accordingly.
More to think about:
The Invisible Workforce: Tiziana Terranova and the Politics of Digital Labour
