The contrast between a hermeneutics of suspicion and a hermeneutics of trust captures Gadamer’s distinctive stance toward interpretation in the modern world. The phrase “hermeneutics of suspicion,” coined by Paul Ricoeur, refers to the critical stance of Marx, Nietzsche, and Freud—three thinkers who taught us to doubt surface meanings, to unmask ideologies, unconscious drives, or hidden power structures behind texts and traditions. Suspicion aims to expose illusion and dismantle authority.
Gadamer recognized the legitimacy of suspicion. Indeed, he acknowledged that critique is a vital part of modern thought. Yet he believed that suspicion alone cannot account for the full reality of understanding. If interpretation is only about unmasking deception, we risk missing the truth that traditions, texts, and conversations can still disclose. This is where Gadamer introduces the notion of a hermeneutics of trust.
Trust, for Gadamer, is not blind acceptance but a fundamental openness to meaning. It is the willingness to let the subject matter speak, to allow tradition or dialogue to address us before we rush to critique. Without such trust, no understanding could even begin. Suspicion presupposes a prior act of trust, since one must first understand what is said before deciding whether it conceals something else. Thus, for Gadamer, trust is the more primordial condition of hermeneutics.
This position aligns with his broader rehabilitation of prejudice and tradition. Rather than treating them as obstacles, Gadamer sees them as starting points for dialogue. True understanding requires both openness and testing: prejudices are brought into play, confronted with the subject matter, and revised when necessary. In this sense, trust and suspicion are not mutually exclusive but dynamically related.
Gadamer’s emphasis on trust has ethical and political significance. In an age of cynicism and polarization, he reminds us that dialogue requires generosity—the readiness to believe that the other might be right, or at least that what they say deserves a hearing. Hermeneutics, then, is not simply about critique but about cultivating solidarity, humility, and respect. Suspicion has its place, but it must be grounded in a deeper hermeneutics of trust.
Learn More:
