Jean-Paul Sartre's novel "Nausea" is a classic of existentialist literature and an exploration of the human condition. At the heart of the novel is the idea that "existence precedes essence", a phrase that has come to be associated with Sartre's philosophy of existentialism.
Sartre's "existence precedes essence" means that human beings are not born with a predetermined nature or essence. Instead, we are born into the world and must create our own identity through our actions and choices. Sartre believed that we are free to make our own choices and that we bear the responsibility for those choices.
In "Nausea," the main character Antoine Roquentin experiences a profound sense of alienation and meaninglessness. He feels that his life has no purpose or direction and that he is adrift in a meaningless universe. As he struggles to make sense of his existence, he comes to realize that he must create his own meaning and purpose.
Roquentin's search for meaning in "Nausea" is a reflection of Sartre's own philosophy of existentialism. Sartre believed that human beings are fundamentally free and that our existence is not determined by any external factors. We are free to choose our own path in life and to create our own values and meaning.
The idea that "existence precedes essence" is a rejection of essentialism, the belief that human beings have a predetermined nature or essence. Sartre believed that essentialism is a form of determinism that denies our freedom and autonomy. By asserting that "existence precedes essence," Sartre was asserting the fundamental freedom and autonomy of human beings. These ideas that were presented in the form of a novel in "Nausea" were later developed by Sartre in his "Being and Nothingness".
Read more:
Kierkegaard's Anxiety Vs. Sartre's Nausea
