Reader Response Theory first started with the work of Louise Rosenblatt. However, Fish's theory differs from traditional approaches to literary interpretation, which focus on the author's intention or the text's historical and cultural context. Instead, Fish argues that the meaning of a text is not fixed or objective, but is dependent on the reader's individual perspective and experience.
Reader-Response Theory and interpretive communities
Fish's notion of "interpretive communities" is central to his reader-response theory. An interpretive community is a group of readers who share similar assumptions, values, and interpretive strategies. Fish argues that the meaning of a text is shaped by the interpretive community to which the reader belongs. For example, a reader who is part of an interpretive community that values feminist perspectives may interpret a text differently than a reader who is part of an interpretive community that values traditional gender roles.
Critics of Fish's theory argue that it leads to a kind of relativism, in which any interpretation is valid as long as it is supported by an interpretive community. However, Fish argues that his theory is not relativistic, but instead recognizes the importance of context and community in the interpretation of texts.
Despite its controversy, Fish's reader-response theory has had a significant impact on literary criticism and the study of literature. It has challenged traditional approaches to interpretation and emphasized the importance of the reader's role in the construction of meaning.
A classic example of Fish's reader-response theory can be found in his Is There a Text in This Class?
See also: