Georg
Simmel's famous article "The Metropolis and Mental Life" was a
groundbreaking work in the field of urban studies and sociology of the city. The
historical background for Simmel's "The Metropolis and Mental Life"
was the move from agrarian forms of life the metropolitan ones in the wake of
the industrial revolution.
Simmel
argues that the move to the metropolis brings about a new form of mental life
which are the result of the certain form of human existence and interactions that
happen in the city. Simmel is not interested in the metropolis itself and man's
mental life themselves, but rather their interaction. "The Metropolis and
Mental Life" examines what happens to a man, and humanity at large, upon
moving to the big city. Simmel talked about a sense of alienation and indifference
that are the result of too much stimuli that the big city hurls at the individual
which is too much for his to take. Simmel also talked about the instrumentalization
or interpersonal relations under the dominant mode of social relation in the
modern metropolis – capitalism.
But
what about this point in time in which most of the people in the west were born
in the big metropolis, and did not migrate to it. Are Simmel's observations
regarding people's mental lives still relevant for people born 100 years after "The
Metropolis and Mental Life". If one was to think that humanity has somehow
grown accustomed to massive stimuli he should bear in mind that this urban
bombardment of signs and meanings is exponentially growing and we have to
filter more, not less. Simmel argued that the other side of the metropolis coin
is that indifference makes you in a sense liberated from social constraints and
allows you to be who you want to be. Is this still relevant today? Indifference
is definitely a trademark of big city life, but is freedom?
See also:
Georg Simmel - The Stranger
Georg Simmel / The Problem of Sociology
-
See also:
Georg Simmel - The Stranger
Georg Simmel / The Problem of Sociology
-