Reader Response Theory (RRT) has been a popular perspective in literary criticism since the 1960s. The theory emphasizes the role of the reader in interpreting a text, arguing that every reader brings their own experiences, biases, and emotions to a text, which affects their understanding and interpretation of it. Despite facing criticism from some quarters, Reader Response Theory has been used widely by literary scholars such as Stanley Fish and Louise Rosenblatt to gain new insights into literary works.
Understanding the Significance of the Reader
One of the main uses of Reader Response Theory is to help us understand the significance of the reader in the interpretation of a text. By emphasizing the role of the reader in shaping meaning, RRT helps us to appreciate the diversity of readings that a literary work can generate. This is particularly useful in analyzing works that have been interpreted in vastly different ways over time.
Revealing Unconscious Biases
Another use of Reader Response Theory is to reveal unconscious biases that may influence the interpretation of a text. By acknowledging that every reader brings their own experiences and emotions to a text, RRT helps to reveal the ways in which these experiences and emotions shape our interpretation. This can be particularly useful in analyzing works that deal with issues such as race, gender, and sexuality.
Bridging the Gap between Reader and Text
Reader Response Theory can also be used to bridge the gap between the reader and the text. By emphasizing the role of the reader in shaping meaning, RRT can help readers to connect with a text on a deeper level. This is particularly useful in analyzing works that are difficult or challenging, as it can help readers to engage with the text on their own terms.
Providing a New Perspective
Finally, Reader Response Theory can be used to provide a new perspective on a literary work. By emphasizing the role of the reader in shaping meaning, RRT can help us to see a work in a new light. This can be particularly useful in analyzing works that have been interpreted in a fixed way for a long time.
See also: