So what does it mean to be?
Heidegger asked about being as an action which
one does within the world. He assumed that the world is not a formless
mass, but that there are meaningful references in it. These meanings are not
inherit in things themselves, but always have something to do with our
relationship towards them. Therefore being for Heidegger is structured and possesses
a certain unity in its diversity. For example, there is a meaningful
connection between the hammer and the nail – but how can this be understood?
"From where, that is: from which given horizon do we understand something
like being?". Heidegger's answer to this was: "The horizon from which
something like being becomes understandable at all is time." According to
Heidegger, the importance of time for being has not been considered in all
previous philosophy. Time is needed as the dimension in which things can gain
meaning. The question of being for Heidegger is therefore inseparable from its relation
to time.
See also: Ontological Difference
Here you can read an introduction and find
summaries and explanations on Heidegger’s “Being and Time”. You can also check
out our introduction to Heidegger or our introduction to phenomenology.