Perhaps the
most recognizable figure associated with postmodern thought is Michel Foucault (1937–1984). Foucault
incorporated a variety of theoretical insights, particularly from Karl Marx, Max Weber, and Friedrich Nietzsche. Like Nietzsche, he was particularly interested
in the relationship between power and knowledge.
Foucault’s
early work focused on the structures that underlie the limits of discourse and
the ways in which discourses create “truth.” Thus, much of Foucault’s work focuses on
discourses (see Foucault's concept of discourse) related to the creation of the human sciences, such as psychology.
Foucault’s work during this period ranged from investigating medical discourses
and the construction of normative understanding of people (normal versus pathological)
and ultimately into the problematic surrounding the emergence of people as both
subject and object of knowledge.
In addition,
Foucault’s later, less structuralist work sought to create a genealogy of
power, a type of historical analysis that does not seek invariable laws of
social change, but rather recognizes the contingency of history. Substantively,
Foucault’s genealogy questioned the ways in which knowledge and power
interpenetrate in certain types of practices, such as the regulation of the
body, governing bodies, and the formation of the self (see Foucault on power and knowledge). Thus, it asks how people
govern themselves and others through the production of knowledge. Foucault pays
particular attention to the techniques that are developed from knowledge and to
how they are used to control people, what he terms as technologies of power. For Foucault, history is punctuated with
changing forms of domination.
In Discipline and Punish, Foucault reinterprets the transformation of crime and
punishment, shifting the explanation away from humanistic concerns and towards the
need to rationalize the functions of discipline and punishment. Foucault
attempts to highlight the multivalent, multidimensional nature of this
transformation by acknowledging the relationship between the new techniques of
punishment and discipline with the encroachment of power throughout society. These “micro-physics of power” were based on
hierarchical observation, normalizing judgments, and examination, and they were
originally taken from the military. These find their ultimate expression in the
Panopticon, a structure designed by Jeremy
Bentham for observing criminals.
The characteristics of the panopticon are important, because it allows for the
shift in regulatory power to the individual, as they now self-monitor their
behavior. Foucault is also interested in the relationship between sex and
power. Here again he reinterprets history to show the ways in which medicine is
more concerned with morality than with sexuality.
This might also interest you:
Stanley Fish -Is There a Text in This Class?
Stanley Fish -Is There a Text in This Class?
More about Foucault:
Michel Foucaul - ""The History of Sexuality"
Michel Foucaul - ""The History of Sexuality"
Foucault - "Of Other Spaces" - summary
Michel Foucault: Panopticism - Summary
Foucault's Panopticism explained
Michel Foucault and Marxism
Foucault, Structuralism and post-structuralism
Truth and Power / Foucault
Michel Foucault - The Discourse on Language
Michel Foucault: Panopticism - Summary
Foucault's Panopticism explained
Michel Foucault and Marxism
Foucault, Structuralism and post-structuralism
Truth and Power / Foucault
Michel Foucault - The Discourse on Language
Biopolitics and Biopower